An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan
An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
limitation of liability to the extent of the cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
record of your department there isn't any record out there whatsoever regarding promotion of the petitioner(Promotion)
Reasonable grounds are offered about the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. However punishment from the alleged offence does not drop in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nonetheless uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance has been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
Upholding Justice: The application with the regulation and also the subsequent punishment on the guilty party give a sense of closure and justice on the target’s family and loved types.
This system, to be used by members with the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father on the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness from the event.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, may be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution with the read more convicted person being a consequence of their crime.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by doing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death from the this kind of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation will not be entertainable to the reasons that these kinds of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, along with the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate therefore this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court just isn't inside a position to dilate upon these disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system isn't without flaws: overhauling is overdue along with the legislation regarding murder calls for serious reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be carried out is to be certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.